You are watching: Does a walk count as an at bat
In tiny League, pressed up against the chain attach dugout, kids cheer top top teammates. A few foul balls and a deep counting earns a chorus the \"Nice at bat!\" and also \"Way to job-related the count!\" If a to walk results, the youngsters regularly sing the \"Nice at bat!\" refrain. Older and a little wiser, we baseball fans regularly revert earlier to our little Leaguer selves, excited to prayer big-leaguers in the same means while absorbing a game.
You can imagine my surprise as soon as I learned that the in ~ bat together a stat go not encompass walks. Never ever has. The thousands of \"Nice at bat!\" plaudits hollered out over the years after a player attracted a walk were wrong. Every our lives, us should\"ve been yelling \"Nice plate appearance!\" come the ballplayers we were rooting on, even if it is at the tiny League diamond or in a major League cathedral.
The at bat provides us one incomplete picture of a batter\"s as whole performance that pipeline out an ext than just walks. The difference between the at bat and also the more encompassing plate appearance can be depicted in two interrelated ways: what each includes and what each excludes.
Here is what the at bat stat excludes:WalkSacrificeHit by pitchCatcher\"s interference (which is actually an error, however I\"ve included separately)
The following occasions are what the bowl appearance stat excludes:Catcher\"s interference (because the batter was denied a chance to totter or walk)
Looking at the two stats in opposing way, the following outcomes are what count as an in ~ bat:StrikeoutHitFielder\"s choiceBatted outReached ~ above error
The key appearance has the complying with plays:StrikeoutHitFielder\"s choiceBatted outWalkReached ~ above errorHit by pitchSacrifice
The bowl appearance includes virtually every time a player digs into the batter\"s box. The in ~ bat contains comparatively under plays. For this reason the bowl appearance gives us a bigger picture of a player\"s batting efforts due to the fact that it includes much more plays. Relying on the player, this have the right to mean a sizable difference.
Matt Carpenter automatically comes to mind. The is a grinder v a bat in his hands. Carpenter functions the count and also draws a lot of walks. Let\"s compare Carpenter to an additional leadoff man, but one who is much more of a totally free swinger and also less that a walker. The adhering to chart compares Carpenter\"s 2013 stats to those that Cubs shortstop Starlin Castro.
Castro notched 40 an ext ABs than Carpenter did, 666 to 626. However Carpenter\"s 717 PAs to be 12 much more than Castro\"s 705. Making use of ABs to to compare the two players is misleading since the stat encompassed many an ext of Castro\"s batting plays 보다 Carpenter\"s.
Several years earlier here in ~ VEB, the Red Baron and I got into a discussion about the usage of the at bat stat matches the key appearance. Throughout that discussion, he and I made decision that utilizing the plate appearance was much better because it to be a more comprehensive and therefore more accurate reflection of a player\"s batting accomplishments. That\"s why we use the bowl appearance rather of the at bat when stating batting here at VEB.
bgh note: The picture of Carpenter acquisition a pitch is too good not to include the uncropped version.
See more: Still Swollen After Do Dogs Nipples Swell During A Heat Cycle Of Female Dogs
Correction: The original version the this short article incorrectly had reaches on error as being excluded indigenous the in ~ bat stat.