This is a digitized version of an post from The Times’s print archive, before the begin of digital publication in 1996. To keep these write-ups as they initially appeared, The times does no alter, edit or upgrade them.

You are watching: Why did segregationists want to impeach earl warren


Occasionally the digitization process introduces warrior errors or other problems; we are proceeding to job-related to enhance these archived versions.
Former chef Justice Warren Dead in funding at 83 General, Governor and also Chief righteousness spans one of the many dynamic eras in our history and his contribution was big indeed.

“During mine tenure in office he to be constantly obtainable for consultation ~ above the farming problems of the federal courts and his way counsel was invaluable.

“In retirement he ongoing to it is in active, speak to students on collage campuses every ger, who succeeded Mr. Warren, said: “Earl Warren's life epitomized the American dream. His distinct half‐century of public business spans one of the many dynamic ages in our background and his donation was big indeed.”

“During my tenure in office,” Mr. Burger said, “he to be constantly obtainable for consultation top top the farming problems that the commonwealth courts and his wise counsel to be invaluable.”


Associate righteousness Thurgood Marshall, the very first black named to the Court, stated of Mr. War??? “When history is written, he'll go under as among the greatest Chief justices the country has ever been blessed with. I think he is irreplacea ble.”

16 years on Bench

Justice Marshall claimed that Mr. Warren had been a catalyst not only in civil rights “but the best of the individual.”

“And I would certainly say individual legal rights are more important 보다 civil rights, and also I think he to be the focus allude of the government, emphasizing the individual's rights,” righteousness Marshall said.

A can be fried Court spokesman stated that Justices wilhelm 0. Douglas and William J. Brennan Jr. Had actually visited Mr. Warren this afternoon and stayed until 5:30 P.M. Mr. Warren had wanted them to remain on, yet they feeling they should not provided his condition, the spokesman said.

Mr. Warren was Attorney basic of California for 4 years, branch for 12 and also the Republican candidate for Vice president in 1948. However his long political job was totally overshadowed through his almost 16 years as Chief Justice, native 1953 to 1969.


It was often said the no cook Justice since John Marshall had actually had so profound an impact on American law and life. During the Warren year the supreme Court, typically a conservative influence, became a force for libertarian reform.

The institution segregation case, Brown v. Bdard of Education, to be the best‐known symbol of those years. Chose on may 17, 1954, just eight months after Mr. Warren took his seat, the situation held segregated colleges unconstitutional, overruling the 60‐year‐old separatebut‐equal doctrine. Later cases used the new rule to all racial barriers imposed through law.

The chief Justice's role in the Brown instance was hidden, through the supreme Court legacy of secrecy in deliberation. However many student of the period believe the he had actually a an important role in achieve unanimity on the Court.

The windy knew the gyeongju segregation cases far better than any kind of others in the Warren years.

But transforms just together sweeping last law and legislative apportionment.

The Warren Court taken the structure to carry out many brand-new rights for those doubt or accused that crime. Because that example; all poor defendants were because that the very first time guarantee the appropriate to complimentary counsel. Proof secured through illegal police methods was exclude, from use at trials.

Then, in 1966, came the landmark case of Miranda v. Arizona. The Court organized that all arrested persons had actually a best to check out a lawyer before being questioned by the police—a cost-free lawyer if they might not pay because that one—and had actually to be advised of that right.

Chief justice Warren once said himself the he concerned the apportionment situations as much more important than those dealing with either race or criminal defendants’ rights.


Precedents had barred commonwealth courts from even considering challenges to legislative branch districts that were gerrymandered or grossly unlike in population. Then, in 1962, the Court turned away from that background and said that federal judges could think about apportionment cases.

Two year later, in a enormous opinion by the cook Justice, the Court held that every residence of every state legislature had actually to be districted dramatically on the communication of equal population. The result was the redistricting, in a brief time, of virtually all American state legislatures.

These instances made Earl Warren a extremely controversial figure, really likely the many controversial judge of the century. Southerly segregationists ran projects to “impeach Earl Warren.” for free honored him much more than they did most Presidents.

A liberal Record

Ironically, this free reformist judge had been appointed through a conservative President, Dwight D. Eisenhower. Privately, president Eisenhower made clear in later on years he had been surprised and not constantly pleased by the judicial document of the male he moved from the governorship of California come the supreme Court.

But in fact Mr. Warren had been a especially liberal Governor, who inhabited the facility of the politics spectrum in California and made a habit of winning both Republican and also Democratic nominations.

See more: L Homme C Est Rien L Oeuvre C Est Tout, Sherlock Holmes Speaks French

He to be a huge man v a hearty manner, that loved the outdoors and also felt at ease v ordinary, functioning people. However his plain exterior hidden a powerful character that bridled at any kind of suggestion the impropriety.

From his seat on the bench cook Justice Warren would regularly indicate a distaste for something the the Federal government or a state had actually done to some individual. He would ask counsel, as if the last were personally responsible, “Was that fair?”